The opportunity to see this trial with one’s own eyes is the obvious remedy. In addition, fewer Americans than ever read print media that aim for objectivity. The dangers of misinformation about the fairness of the judicial process are magnified by the reality that so many of today’s television viewers are siloed into outlets that filter news to confirm their audiences’ biases. Chutkan, as “ unfair” and special counsel Jack Smith as “ deranged.” Trump has also sprinkled in untruths designed to enrage his supporters about being “arrested,” a claim that U.S. We have already seen Trump’s social media posts attacking the federal judge assigned to the case, Tanya S. Giving Americans the opportunity to witness these judicial proceedings directly will help ensure what is needed under the rule of law - faith in the process of getting to the truth.īecause of the Justice Department’s ethical restraints on contemporaneous public statements about trials, in this one, only one side - and one with enormous communication reach - will be amplifying its version of each day’s courtroom events. Sadly, it may only help him with his base.Īt the same time, the trial of Trump relating to his alleged attempt to end the lawful transfer of presidential power will be America’s most consequential moment of legal accountability since 1807, when Aaron Burr was tried for treason for plotting to wage a violent insurrection against our government. The latest indictment of former President Trump is the most serious by far, laying out charges uniquely damaging to democracy. Opinion Editorial: Trying to overturn an election must have consequences, even for former presidents In the ordinary course, while opinions differ about televised court proceedings, the desire to protect their solemnity and to avoid incentives for performative behavior before a broad public audience seems understandable. Sunlight here can best enlighten the electorate. In the context of the 2024 election in which Trump appears headed to win the Republican Party’s nomination, nothing is more vital. Americans will be able to see a former president being treated like any citizen who is accused of a crime. 1 indictment lays it out and a new poll underlines it.Īllowing televising of this trial, with strict court-supervised guardrails, would indisputably have that effect by permitting citizens of every political stripe to form their own judgment of the proceedings adjudicating Trump’s innocence or guilt. The former president’s “knowingly false claims” eroded the public trust in voting. Opinion Calmes: Trump’s election lies got him indicted, but they’ve worked all too well
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |